There can be confusion around the appropriate terminology for trans and queer identities, even within the trans community itself. As language is constantly evolving, it can be especially difficult to know what to say. As a thorough A-Z glossary of trans and queer words from ‘ace’ to ‘xe’, this dictionary guide will help to dispel the anxiety around using the “wrong” words, while explaining the weight of using certain labels and providing individuals with a vocabulary for personal identification.
Having correct and accurate terminology to describe oneself can be empowering, especially with words and phrases that describe gender identity, sexuality, sexual orientation, as well as slang relevant to LGBTQ+ rights and anti-discrimination, queer activism, gender-affirming healthcare and psychology.
When you have a question about a term used in the LGBTQIA+ community it can be hard to find a definition that is trustworthy. There’s the internet… but it’s the internet, and some pages are sketchy. The A-Z of Gender and Sexuality is a place to go with these questions, if you just want some info, or if you’re interested in related history.
Holleb, who is trans, bisexual, nonbinary, and uses he/him pronouns, writes with an unabashedly activist point of view that I’m glad for. He has no problem saying that we shouldn’t use a certain word, or that a particular (often hateful) way of looking at the world is wrong. In the introduction he also says that we, the reader, are not obliged to agree with him on everything, and are free to cross out passages and rip out pages as we see fit. I find the invitation refreshing and welcome.
I read the book straight through, as is my wont, and had a mixed experience. The information itself is great. A bunch of questions that have been stewing in the back of my mind were clearly answered, and learned some words that I didn’t even know existed. Some are terms used within the community, others are words that have fallen out of fashion or the times but nevertheless are still good to know.
However, as a whole the writing is uneven. It feels like it’s trying to be academic in parts but sourcing is inconsistent and clunky. Some sections give lots of facts and percentages that don’t serve the reader as well as a thoughtful summary would. More than a few glossary entries stray into essay-length reiterations of history, and while at times enlightening they are often lists of facts, like the names and dates for organizations connected with a certain cause. The information isn’t bad, I just wanted it synthesized a little more.
Overall it’s okay. I learned a bunch, but it could have been put together more cohesively. As a result its a bit hit-and-miss as a resource, but it will definitely start you on the right track.
Thanks to Jessica Kingsley Publishers and Edelweiss for providing a review copy.