Andrea Louviere is seven years old the first time he appears. While she’s alone in her bedroom, practicing her beloved cello, the light shivers and a crack forms in the wall. Through the crack, she sees a candle, a window, a desk—and a boy. Though no sound travels through the wall, the boy clearly sees Andrea, too. And then, just as quickly as it opened, the crack closes, and he vanishes.
Over the years, summoning the bright, magnetic boy becomes something of an obsession for Andrea. Then, on her seventeenth birthday, she receives a three-hundred-year-old love letter from Isaac Newton. Andrea knows that Isaac will change the world with his groundbreaking discoveries; the letter tells Andrea that she will change him.
As Isaac’s letters intensify in passion and intimacy, Andrea grows determined to follow his clues to their shared destiny—despite a burgeoning romance in the present. Only when she discovers the way into Isaac’s time does Andrea realize that she faces a heartbreaking decision: between what was . . . and what might be.
I loved and was flummoxed by this book in turns but it always, always kept me reading. I finished it in less than 24 hours so while I have Things to say know that Love and Gravity is hard to put down.
Also be rest assured that I’m not going to spoil anything… here. If you’d like to read a more detailed, spoiler-filled version of this review head over to the goodreads version where I give those spoiler tags a run for their money.
Now that that’s out of the way…
~takes a deep breath~
Wow. What a book.
- Time travel and time slip plots can get hairy as far as sequence of events go, but Sotto keeps events mostly on the rails. (Caveats below.) Each chapter starts by telling us which character we’re following, Andrea or Issac, and places them in time by date and/or age. In the narrative we’re reminded which years are important, so even when the chronology jumps around we can keep things basically straight.
- The cast is small so there aren’t too many people to keep track of. We watch them all grow over time in strikingly realistic ways.
- Yea for epistolary (ish) novels!
- If you don’t know much about Issac Newton’s life you’ll find yourself going down delightful wikipedia rabbit holes out of curiosity.
- Even when things are crazy, even when you’re yelling “What?” and “How?!” at the pages, you will be compelled to read on.
- Do you need a cathartic cry? I hope you need a cathartic cry.
- This is a novel with a romance, not a romance novel. If you know what that means then you know what I mean.
- Anachronisms, we haz them. Spoken British English in 1666 sounds a bit too close to modern American speech for my liking. There are others but they have to go in the spoiler-ful review.
- The curse of working in medicine is finding medical goofs in novels. Won’t bother everyone, I’m sure, but I had to put down the book and vent to my partner before continuing.
- Events and sequencing get more complicated by the end and I have the feeling that if I looked I would find something that doesn’t check out. Sotto earned just enough of my trust for me to gloss over inconsistencies, and man there are a lot of balls in the air, but the nagging feeling that something is wrong won’t go away.
- The whole book stemmed from a plot bunny in a chest, and at times it feels like revisionist history. Andrea is can be seen as a wish-fulfillment Mary Sue – Newton was a great guy and never got married, so let’s go back and put a woman in his life!
- An apple or gravity reference is cute once or twice but there are so. many. I couldn’t stop rolling my eyes.
In sum my reading experience went like this:
Beginning – Ooo, interesting! Tell me more.
Third of the way through – I’m not sure I’m on board but I want to see how you manage this…
Halfway point – Hello, anachronism.
Middle-ish – I saw this coming but what the hell was that?!
Last few chapters – ~sob~ No, I’m fine, it’s just that… ~sob~
End – ~runs to write review posthaste~